sexstories.com
Comments from READER
| Date | Story title | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2007-10-10 10:24:29 | Lisa @ 4 | yumyum |
| 2007-10-20 16:51:48 | Lisa @ 4 | What's with all these readers arguing over the proper age? four is too young, but 14 would be okay, no wait, maybe if she were 6 or 7 it might be better. it's pedophilia either way, but it happens to be "fantasy!!!!!!" what a bunch of hypocrites. |
| 2007-10-25 02:45:03 | Lisa @ 4 | No question that this was the most disgusting, perverted, sick soty--fiction or not--that I ever had the displeasure of wasting my time reading. It had one benefit, it helped me vomit up some rotten food! The author cannot be anything less than a Pedophile. Rate this 10---MINUS 10THAT IS! |
| 2007-11-14 03:39:51 | Lisa @ 4 | wow, the dude tha posted that right below me is a sicko....you should go to hell you faggot! young girls at that age don't even need to be ever visualized as a sex target...I mean really...its just not in the area of being natural. 14 and above (which is still to young..but better) is the limit area my friend...give or take, you have two choice's...a: write out the storie till the kid is old enough...or b: just keep writeing your "unnatural" thinking of fantisies...erm...however thats spelled..... well dude, I'm not going to say your a bad writer....you just a little sick..thats all... |
| 2007-11-29 17:48:41 | Lisa @ 4 | why do readers of a story titled "lisa at four" feel the need to comment about the under age factor? its like the commentors on the beastiality stories saying "yuck nasty". you fuckers all KNEW what sort of story you were looking up, get over yourselves. i thought it was fairly well written with better grammar and descriptions than most of the damn comments. |